Sobering Thoughts

Comments on politics, the culture, economics and religion by Paul Tuns -- in short, everything about the human endeavour from a non-hyphenated conservative perspective. I am Toronto-based writer and editor, whose articles, columns and reviews have appeared in more than 35 publications. I am editor-in-chief of The Interim, Canada's life and family newspaper, author of Jean Chretien: A Legacy of Scandal and a regular contributor to the book pages of the Halifax Herald.

XML This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Sunday, July 05, 2015
While everyone is paying attention to Greece ...
The big global economic story might be happening in China. Reuters: "China rolls out emergency measures to prevent stock market crash." Reuters reports:
The government is anxiously awaiting the market opening on Monday to see if the new measures will halt a 30 percent plunge in the last three weeks, or if panicky investors who borrowed heavily to speculate on stocks will continue to sell.
In an extraordinary weekend of policy moves, brokerages and fund managers vowed to buy massive amounts of stocks, helped by China's state-backed margin finance company which in turn would be aided by a direct line of liquidity from the central bank.
China has also orchestrated a halt to new share issues, with dozens of firms scrapping their IPO plans in separate but similarly worded statements over the weekend, in a tactic authorities have used before to support markets.
"After the 28 companies suspended their IPOs, there will be no new IPOs in the near term," the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) said in a statement on Sunday night.
Last week's restrictions did nothing to halt China's stock market slide. Reuters reports:
A surprise interest-rate cut by the central bank last week, relaxations in margin trading and other "stability measures" did little to calm investors, who sent shares down another 12% in the last week alone.
Quartz's Matt Phillips says that China's markets are normally volatile, although 2015 is more volatile than usual:
Since June 12, China’s Shanghai Composite and Shenzhen index are down 29% and 33% respectively. That decline comes after a remarkable surge that put those very same indices up more than 60% and 120% at their highest points this year. And despite the sell-off, the Shanghai index remains up 79% over the last year. The Shenzhen is up 89% over the same period.
The Financial Times story on the new measures to rebuild confidence in the market has two noteworthy quotes. Fraser Howie, an expert on China’s capital markets, who is skeptical of the new limits, said: "Almost every one of these measures reeks of panic and is very short-sighted. It’s going to be another crazy week." And, Zhang Ming, an economist at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said there are larger implications than the stock market and IPOs: "If the market doesn’t climb after all these measures, it means investors have lost confidence in the government." Of course, these two quotes could be both correct, with the former (new regulations based on panic) contributing to the latter (lack of confidence in the government).
Meanwhile, according to the South China Morning Post the Hong Kong stock market could get a boost from the mainland's limits on initial public offering.

Greece says no
It appears that about six in ten Greeks said no to the bailout conditions. The conventional wisdom is that this means Greece will leave the euro zone, but that is still some way down the road and it will be a difficult (and not straight) road to Grexit. More immediately, the euro is going to decline in value slightly, expect stock markets in Europe to decline, and the European Central Bank will try to quell fears, although what it can do is far from certain. In fact, the ECB is probably the most important player right now. Donald Tusk, president of the European Council, is calling for an emergency summit as soon as Tuesday. As the Wall Street Journal reported, no one in Europe seems to know what to do in the fallout of the no vote.
For most observers, it is difficult to separate one's view of Europe as a political project and the economic consequences. Remember that the euro and European Union are not the same thing, although both will take a reputational hit this week based on the political reaction. Whatever happens not what Tyler Cowen said: "things can go badly under either a yes or no vote." Scott Sumner has eight insta-reactions, the most important being that minor tweaks to the bailout are no longer on the table (presumably because of the size of the vote against) and Grexit is not a foregone conclusion: "Greece may join it’s neighbor to the north Montenegro in being a de facto euro member, but not a de jure member."

Fixed election dates
The Canadian Press reports:
The first fixed-date election in Canadian history is just around the corner, but some observers are raising concerns about overspending because of a law they say is flawed.
When the Conservatives introduced a fixed election date nine years ago, political financing rules were not adjusted accordingly, says Elections Canada boss Marc Mayrand.
"We must not be blind," said Mayrand. "As much as it is easier for Elections Canada to plan for the election, it's just as easy for political parties and third parties" to plan their spending before the election.
Those expenses generally go "beyond the rules outlined in the electoral law," he added.
Three points.
1. Whatever the rules are governing elections and campaigns, political parties will try to game them.
2. If political financing outside the writ period is not against the rules, perhaps Maynard should shut the fuck up about it.
3. Does anyone outside the Queensway care about this?

Your penis shouldn't have a name
Writing in The Guardian Robert Myers urges men not to name their penis:
Seven out of 10 men, this survey claims, name their penis. We are unreliably informed that 72% of men go for a masculine name for their penis, such as Hercules or Troy, while the remainder opt for a wacky identity such as “Russell the Muscle”. The bravado of any man prepared to risk a joke name for his penis has to be fleetingly admired, but the desperate awfulness of naming it after an ancient warrior has all the predictability of a used-car showroom. Just as Mitsubishi aren’t really selling a hereditary military commander from the days of Japanese feudalism, so your pants don’t contain a divine hero capable of slaying a nine-headed hydra or cleaning out the Augean stables in a limited timeframe.

Why is this the UN's business?
CBC: "Canada Without Poverty charity challenges Harper govt. audits at UN in Geneva." The state broadcaster further reports: "Ottawa anti-poverty charity in Geneva this week arguing before UN that political-activity audits are an abuse." This is an issue worth debating but not in front of an international organization. Harriett McLachlan, president of Canada Without Poverty, said the 10% rule limiting charities to spend no more one in ten dollars on political activities has groups such as hers fearful they are stepping over the bounds when they organize protests or petitions in what they call attempts to hold the government accountable. But under Canadian law holding the government to account is not a charitable purpose. If Canada without Poverty wants to take part in those activities they can forego the charitable tax status. There is no human rights abuse in preventing charities from taking part in politics; the group and individuals involved with it can still exercise their political rights, they just can't issue tax receipts if they do.

Natalie Solent at Samizdata: "Victim status is a lousy substitute for real status." She says:
What is it like to be the object of this code?
– Lonely. You will feel surrounded by enemies. And all outside your exact caste must be enemies: it is impossible for friendship to develop across the divides of privilege when every mundane interaction that might in other circumstances have led to friendship is fraught with tension. Thus one one of the main benefits claimed to accrue from diversity on campus is lost.
– Exhausting. You will be continually on the defensive, and for all your obligation to be constantly angry, passive and unable to control your own destiny. How could it be otherwise? You have chosen to centre your life on how your enemies perceive you. If black, your constant concern is what whites think of you; if female, what males think of you; whatever category you belong to defines you.
The full post is worth reading.

Will finds a kernel of goodness in Roberts Obamacare decision
George Will says that critics, "including this columnist, may have missed a wrinkle in Roberts’s ACA opinion that will serve conservatives’ long-term interests." Will examines Roberts' language in both his dissent in an Arizona redistricting case and the majority opinion of the Affordable Care Act, concluding:
Construing the Constitution in the Arizona case, Roberts said the Framers’ language was as clear as their purpose, to which deference is due. Interpreting the health-care statute, Roberts said Congress’s language was “inartful” but, read in the context of the ACA’s structure, was not ambiguous and should not defeat Congress’s purpose, to which the court owes deference.
Roberts’s ruling advanced a crucial conservative objective, that of clawing back power from the executive branch and independent agencies that increasingly operate essentially free from congressional control and generally obedient to presidents. If conservatives cannot achieve their objectives, including ACA repeal, through the legislative branch, conservatism’s future is too bleak to be much diminished by anything courts do. If, however, conservatives can advance their agenda through Congress, they will benefit from Roberts’s ACA opinion, which buttresses legislative supremacy.

Saturday, July 04, 2015
Rauch on Greece
Jonathan Rauch tweets: "Germany (of all countries!) repeats the errors of Versailles."

Summer reading
National Review Online has various contributors recommend some books to read this summer.
I recommend Canadians read -- or at least buy -- The Dauphin: The Truth about Justin Trudeau. And tell their friends about it. You can get The Truth about Liberals, a package consisting of The Dauphin, my 2004 book Jean Chretien: A Legacy of Scandal, and Daniel Dickin's Liars: The McGuinty-Wynne Record, for $50.95 including shipping. The Dauphin is also available for Kindle.
And for something completely non-political, two good baseball books: Big Data Baseball: Math, Miracles, and the End of a 20-Year Losing Streak by Travis Sawchik and Strangers in the Bronx: DiMaggio, Mantle, and the Changing of the Yankee Guard by Andrew O'Toole. I hope my summer reading will include Split Season: 1981: Fernandomania, the Bronx Zoo, and the Strike that Saved Baseball by Jeff Katz.
The book I'm most looking forward to reading this summer is Donald Creighton: A Life in History by Donald Wright, my old University of Waterloo history professor. Wright will probably focus on Creighton's political views (decidedly Tory by the end of his life) but Creighton should be remembered for more than his late-life crankiness; he was a beautiful writer and influential political historian.

Greece and Puerto Rico
Scott Sumner looks at the similarities between Greece and Puerto Rico, and some important differences (German policy may not hurt Greece as much American policy harms Puerto Rico). Sumner might be under-estimating the harm done to the Greek economy by the austerity imposed upon it from foreign powers, including Germany, but it is nonetheless an interesting post with a provocative title, "Does Germany 'care' about Greece more than America 'cares' about Puerto Rico?" The U.S. federal minimum wage is probably doing serious harm to employment in the island territory than does not compare to any of the deleterious effects of German policy and Greece.

Gay marriage vs. religious freedom
William Galston in the Wall Street Journal:
Nor does the court’s decision restrict the right of faith communities to establish their own criteria for membership and leadership, or to discipline and even expel individuals who no longer meet those criteria. Each denomination is free to decide whether those who enter into same-sex marriages are fit to serve as its leaders or to remain as members.
For now. Eventually rights bump up against one another -- the rights of gays versus the rights of religious organizations -- and the courts will decide who wins and who loses? Does anyone really believe that courts will uphold the right of churches to discriminate against homosexual individuals? Not a chance.

'The Left makes you show ID for everything -- except voting'
In this Rebel Media video Brian Lilley says the Left loves ID laws on smoking or to buy alcohol, but not to prove one is qualified to vote. Lilley wonders is the double standard due to the fact the Left wants to cheat?

Is Alberta in play?
The Canadian Press reports:
Calgary Mayor Naheed Nenshi said the Alberta NDP win over the Progressive Conservatives could be a sign the New Democrats and the Liberals are poised to challenge Stephen Harper in his home province.
"It may well be that this city is in play for the first time in my lifetime," Nenshi said Friday.
"It doesn't necessarily mean Thomas Mulcair is going to find super fertile ground here, but I think it means Calgarians and Albertans have said we can do different things.
"I think in a number of ridings in Calgary and Edmonton where you've got very strong Liberal or New Democrat candidates there may well be a breakthrough here so we'll see what happens in the fall."
The vote for the NDP is taken as a proof that Albertans will vote for someone other than the Tories. That's one narrative from the provincial election and perhaps not the correct one, but even if it is true provincially it might not be true federally. Another narrative is that the voters punished the provincial Tories because they were arrogant or abandoned their principles (raising taxes, for example) or began to cut spending (holding the line below population growth and inflation). The Harper Conservatives are hardly a forty-year dynasty waiting to be upended, they haven't raises taxes, and they aren't threatening beloved social programs.
The problem with very recent political history is that some people learn the wrong lessons.
I will be surprised if the total number of NDP and Liberals seats in Alberta after the October 19 election is more than three, or either opposition party wins seats in Calgary.

Most underrated presidents
The National Interest has the "5 Most Underrated U.S. Presidents of All Time." Robert W. Merry's list is not a bad one. William McKinley is definitely underrated with a case for being in the top ten presidents, and Calvin Coolidge is a favourite of mine. That said, Ulysses S. Grant is probably overrated when he's rated as high as average.

Great nerdy joke
On a license plate.

Friday, July 03, 2015
Canada might be in recession: who does that help politically?
It's a little crass to reduce a recession and the difficulty it causes for ordinary Canadians to its political consequences, but if Canada is in recession as one economist says -- although others believe we're headed there -- it will be part of the federal campaign headed to October; an economist at the Bank of America Merrill Lynch even predicts the Canadian dollar will fall to 70 cents U.S. by the end of 2015. Pundits will assume that a recession hurts the incumbent Conservatives. I'm not so sure. A little economic anxiety might benefit the Tories because Justin Trudeau doesn't look like a serious adult who can be trusted to manage the economy -- as Abacus Data found earlier this year, Canadians prefer Stephen Harper for economic advice and other money matters even if they prefer Justin Trudeau to pick out a good movie or watch their dog. At the same time voters might not entrust an economy already slowing down to the NDP. If people are hurting -- losing jobs, experiencing declining wages, and, yes, paying more to visit the United States -- the Conservatives will face a political backlash, but (mere) economic anxiety might be to their benefit. But if many voters are feeling the recession personally rather than reading headlines about it, then who benefits? My guess is that the NDP does because Thomas Mulcair is the serious adult with a plan that doesn't look too threatening, especially when compared to the radical Trudeau who has been busy buttressing his left-wing credentials in what he expected to be a campaign for the progressive vote.

How to spend the July 4 weekend talking to your family about Obamacare
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has provided talking points about the Affordable Care Act so you can correct the "misinformation" loved ones might have when they are not properly obliging to Obamacare this holiday weekend
Here is the first scenario the HHS imagines:
Situation: Uncle Ted claims Obamacare is a train wreck and has cost jobs.
You say: Uncle Ted, you’ve gotten ahold of some old talking points. With greater access to affordable, quality health insurance, the Affordable Care Act is helping individuals and strengthening our economy!
Since the main components of the law went into effect, we’ve reduced the number of uninsured by 16.4 million, the largest increase in the insured in decades. Before the ACA, the U.S. economy faced rapidly growing health costs that put enormous pressure on businesses and consumers. We paid more than any country without better health results, and millions of Americans were one illness away from bankruptcy. Today, we’ve seen the slowest growth in health costs in half a century, improved patient safety has saved an estimated 50,000 lives and $12 billion, and employer premiums for family coverage grew just 3 percent in 2014, tied with 2010 for the lowest on record back to 1999.
Meanwhile, since the ACA was signed, the private sector has added 12.8 million jobs over 64 straight months of job growth, extending the longest streak on record. The increase in employment over that period is due almost entirely to higher full-time employment. The number of people working part-time who would prefer to be full-time has fallen by 2.6 million from March 2010 through May 2015, including a decline of 1.1 million since December 2013.
Now, would you like more corn?
But might have job-growth been more robust without the ACA? I also find it amusing that anyone would be expected to remember that talking point (including the line accusing Uncle Ted of using "old talking points").
And then there's this:
Situation: Your brother has a great idea for a start-up, but he’s afraid to lose benefits when he leaves his current job.
You say: The Affordable Care Act can help! (Note: The exclamation point denotes enthusiasm about the ACA, not an instruction to scream at your family.)
The "Tips for Talking to Your Family about the Affordable Care Act this Fourth of July" is ludicrous. Would anyone check out the HHS website for Independence Day conversation? Do they need the instruction about the exclamation point. It's all so cheesy. This is American tax dollars at work. It was someone's job to come up with this.
(HT: Hit & Run)

I guess this is from those days of non-negative campaigning in 1943
Via David Artemiw on Twitter:

Thursday, July 02, 2015
Buyer's remorse
The Calgary Herald reports on a Mainstreet poll which finds, "the Wildrose in the lead with 40 per cent support, ahead of the NDP with 31 per cent, the PC Party with 24 per cent, the Liberals with 3 per cent and the Alberta Party with 2 per cent." However, Premier Rachel Notley's personal popularity is still ahead of the other leaders.

American states and cities could be the next Greece
The Daily Caller reports that the city of Chicago is laying off current workers to pay for former workers:
About 1,400 Chicago public school teachers and staff are expected to lose their jobs in order to finance a pension debt of $634 million, the city announced Wednesday.
The layoffs are part of an aggressive $200 million budget cut to help finance the pension payment, which is required of Chicago Public Schools by Illinois law. The rest of the pension payment is coming from heavy borrowing, as the district already has a massive $1.1 billion budget deficit.
Market Watch reports that Moody’s Investors Service has downgraded the Windy City's credit rating to junk status because of Chicago's pension problems (borrowing about a billion dollars to make its June 30 pension payment). The fear, Market Watch reports, is that pension costs "might push these public entities into insolvency, wiping out much of the holdings of municipal-bond investors." Market Watch reports:
Once a sleepy corner of the municipal bond market — often not even properly reflected on cities’ balance sheets — public pensions have recently turned into the biggest headache for taxpayers and municipal-bond investors, threatening to bring down the finances of U.S. cities and states.
In some places, like Puerto Rico, Illinois, New Jersey and Chicago, entire balance sheets of cities or states hang in the balance.
Detroit, as well as three Californian cities — Vallejo, Stockton and San Bernardino — had to declare bankruptcy because of their overwhelming pension costs.
In those cases, the courtroom turned into a brutal battlefield pitting bond investors trying to save the money they invested in those cities’ municipal bonds on one side. And on the other side have been public employees trying to save the dwindling pensions that were promised to them.
Recent cases have shown that bond investors are clearly losing this battle.
Pensions are remaining intact (82%-100%) as bondholders have faced losses of 40%-99%. Many states have laws against significantly reducing pension benefits. It all adds up to a likely financial crisis, probably sooner than later.

The cure for a politicized court is not further politicizing the court
George Will writes about the role of the courts and the reaction by some Republicans to the same-sex marriage decision. He especially criticizes Ted Cruz who favours what he calls "judicial retention elections" which he describes as:
Every justice, beginning with the second national election after his or her appointment, will answer to the American people and the states in a retention election every eight years. Those justices deemed unfit for retention by both a majority of the American people as a whole and by majorities of the electorates in at least half of the 50 states will be removed from office and disqualified from future service on the court.
Will says:
It is, therefore, especially disheartening that Cruz, who clerked for Chief Justice William Rehnquist and who is better equipped by education and experience to think clearly about courts, proposes curing what he considers this court’s political behavior by turning the court into a third political branch. Imagine campaigns conducted by justices. What would remain of the court’s prestige and hence its power to stand athwart rampant executives and overbearing congressional majorities?

Hollywood Walk of Fame
It's bullshit, of course, and I say that for two reasons. The first is that the celebrities both campaign and have to pay for "installation." Also, the standards seem pretty low; among the two dozen additions this year include Allison Janney, Tracy Morgan, Debra Messing, and Kevin Hart, all of whom seem pretty C-list celebrity. Cyndi Lauper and Itzhak Perlman are just receiving theirs but they'll be joined by Bruno Mars.

Candidate for headline of the year
New York Post: "Hulk Hogan can wear his bandana in court for sex-tape trial."

Wednesday, July 01, 2015
Police seek to divvy up proceeds of (probably) bogus drug bust: the continuing problem of civil asset forfeiture
The Washington Post reports:
In February 2014, Drug Enforcement Administration task force officers at Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Airport seized $11,000 in cash from 24-year-old college student Charles Clarke. They didn't find any guns, drugs or contraband on him. But, according to an affidavit filled out by one of the agents, the task force officers reasoned that the cash was the proceeds of drug trafficking, because Clarke was traveling on a recently-purchased one-way ticket, he was unable to provide documentation for where the money came from, and his checked baggage had an odor of marijuana. (He was a marijuana smoker.)
Clarke's cash, which says he he spent five years saving up, was seized under civil asset forfeiture, where cops are able to take cash and property from people who are never convicted of -- and in some cases, never even charged with -- a crime. The DEA maintains that asset forfeiture is an important crime-fighting tool: "By attacking the financial infrastructure of drug trafficking organizations world-wide, DEA has disrupted and dismantled major drug trafficking organizations and their supply chains, thereby improving national security and increasing the quality of life for the American public."
The police too often treat drug users as drug dealers, an obvious attempt to inflate charges.
The Post also reports:
Two local agencies were involved in the seizure of Clarke's cash: the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Airport Police, and the Covington Police Department, which is the home office of the DEA task force officer who detained and spoke with Clarke. But according to the Institute for Justice, a nonprofit civil liberties group now representing Clarke in court, 11 additional law enforcement agencies -- who were not involved in Clarke's case at all -- have also requested a share of Clarke's cash under the federal asset forfeiture program. They include the Kentucky State Police, the Ohio Highway Patrol, and even the Bureau of Criminal Investigations within the Ohio Attorney General's office.
Civil asset forfeiture, critics say, leads to policing for profit. The larger problem is taking away private property without a guilty verdict, or even charge. It has no place in a free society.

What I'm reading
1. State, Class, and Bureaucracy: Canadian Unemployment Insurance and Public Policy by Leslie A. Pal. A good book from 1988 on the role of the public service in the development of policy.
2. The Dadly Virtues: Adventures from the Worst Job You'll Ever Love edited by Jonathan V. Last. A review will probably appear in the August edition of The Interim.
3. Scandinavian Unexceptionalism: Culture, Markets, and the Failure of Third-Way Socialism by Dr. Nima Sanandaji and published by the Institute of Economic Affairs and available free online. There is a good summary at CapX.
4. "Fiscal Policy Lessons for Alberta’s New Government from other NDP Governments," a Fraser Institute study.
5. The Summer 2015 edition of the Cato Institute's journal, Regulation.
6. The July/August edition of Foreign Affairs. It's focus is robots.

2016 watch (issues edition)
Dan McLaughlin tweets: "I'd give maybe 1 in 4 odds that the #1 issue in the 2016 election will be a foreign policy event that hasn't happened yet." That, and economic anxiety and "change."

Primer on Greek crisis
Anil Kashyap, an economist at the Booth School of Business at the University of Chicago, has a good primer on the Greek crisis. And Tim Worstall clarifies the issue(s) by correcting an egregiously wrong Heidi Moore's explainer on Grexit.
People should chill a bit with the over-the-top predictions and reactions. Few people know what is happening because the range of possibilities -- actions and reactions -- is very large.

Let's keep the state out of the circus troupes of the nation
The Toronto Star: "Canadian government approves Cirque du soleil sale to group headed by U.S. private equity firm." It was okayed because the Industry Ministry deemed the deal an overall economic benefit for Canada. Why the fuck is this government's business?

Gay athletes in the pro sports locker room
People who have never played pro sports are always saying homosexual players would never be accepted in the locker room, that it would be a distraction. Scott Baker, a former Major League Baseball catcher, says that a gay pro baseball player would cause initial awkwardness in the clubhouse but would eventually be welcomed. Baker says:
The locker room is a great homogenizer. Players come from all over the globe, united by their ability to throw, catch or hit a ball. Multiple languages are spoken and learned, international friendships are cultivated and perspectives are shifted. For the better part of eight months, we spend most of our waking hours in close quarters.
We make fun of each other. A LOT. We also make fun of things we can’t control: baldness, height, nose size, et cetera ... nothing is off limits because nothing is taken seriously. We say awful things to each other that if said by anyone else would likely result in a fight. You can’t call him that; only we can. Faulty logic? Probably. We don’t care ...
[I]t’s easy to predict how a baseball team would treat a gay teammate: It wouldn’t be perfect, but he would be welcomed.
And eventually the locker room would find humor in the situation. Sexual orientation would finally take its place alongside the other things we have no control over, like nose size or height. The kind of things a team jokes about with each other. You can’t call him that. Only we can.
Full acceptance, though? Ah, yes. That would finally be achieved during a road game, when some dummy in the stands has one too many beers and screams out a homophobic slur. The collective defense mechanism built on the field and in the locker room would engage. Someone other than the player would respond to that idiot.
The long season forces camaraderie.

Tuesday, June 30, 2015
Stop truncating the Y-axis
Via Chris Blattman (scroll down the post of links), a pair of examples, including the one below, on why truncating the Y-axis on graphs (not starting from O) is misleading. Editors: stop it.

MP departures: do they matter?
Bloomberg has a story about MP departures (not just retirements) and what they mean historically for the governing party. This October, at least 46 of the 166 Conservative MPs elected in 2011 are not running again. Some have already departed: death and retirements. There are new incumbents in a handful of those ridings, so the 46 number is slightly exaggerated. This dropout rate is the third highest since World War II and while pundits seem to think this bodes ill for the Tories, the 1953 Liberals -- one of the two times there was a higher departure rate -- won re-election. The 1993 Tories, were reduced to a rump caucus of two, so their problems were much larger than having 40% of their incumbents choose not to run again. What is notable, however, is that usually when there is a high departure rate, the prime minister (and party leader) is also replaced. The one time when at least a quarter of MPs did not seek re-election and the prime minister stayed at the helm was 1953 -- when Louis St. Laurent won re-election. So maybe Harper will be okay.
The Bloomberg story reports that "Harper will be without several key lieutenants" and that could hurt the Conservatives in October. Maybe. But the same story's penultimate paragraph begins "The electoral impact of individual MPs has been lessened as Canadian campaigns become more 'presidentialized' by focusing on leaders," according to one source they talked to. In an era of leader-centric campaigns, the team around the prime minister matters much less; it might have mattered when Stephen Harper was not known commodity. Usually questions about whether there is a sufficient bench upon which to draw talent to fill a cabinet is reserved for new or rising parties, but it is unclear how much those questions translate into voting preferences. Ultimately, Canadians aren't electing any party because of who's filling the Industry or Justice portfolio, but the person who will making those appointments: the prime minister. Two parties have serious adults vying for that job; the Liberals do not. If a party has to trot out Bill Morneau and Andrew Leslie it's because they know their leader is weak and they need to try to instill confidence in a public that doesn't quite trust the Liberal leader to be a serious adult.
Lastly, a party that has lost James Moore and Peter MacKay is better off than a party that still has Carolyn Bennett and Hedy Fry.
UPDATE: The final sentence could have been phrased better, but you get the point. No insult intended to Moore or MacKay.

'Planetary Defense is a Public Good'
Alex Tabarrok notes that today is Asteroid Day and not enough is being done to protect us Earthlings from the catastrophic impact of being struck by a large asteroid. There is a $200,000 Indiegogo campaign for a "near-Earth object mitigation technology study." Tabarrok points to a research published in Nature that suggests the casualties associated with a large-asteroid strike would exceed that of plane crashes or many other natural disasters.
Note that Brian May of Queen is one of the people behind Asteroid Day. Here is a video that looks like a movie trailer:

Tweet of the day
Jim Treacher:
"No, gay marriage won't be used as a weapon against churches," say the people who want to shut down a bakery for refusing to bake a cake.

Not The Onion
Crowdfunding Greek Bailout Fund on Indiegogo seeking 1.6 billion euros by next Tuesday. Incentives includes postcards of Greek Prime Minister, Greek salad, and ouzo.
(HT: MarketWatch)

Monday, June 29, 2015
A park is no place for kids
Lenore Skenazy at Hit & Run:
A 7-year-old in Westbrook, Maine, was playing at the park within eyesight of her family’s house. Someone called 911 (of course) and the police swooped in. They took the girl to the precinct because, as this WMTW reporter notes, “Mom wasn’t watching.”
What? Mom didn’t devote her afternoon to sitting at the side of the park and watching her child’s every move? Tsk, tsk. The child was on her own for about an hour, and as Police Chief Janine Roberts told the reporter, “That’s a long time for a 7-year-old girl to be by herself any place, let alone a park.”
Yes, the park is certainly the last place you’d ever want to see a kid hanging out. What kind of crazy mom would let her child go there?
Of course the mom was charged with child endangerment.

Judy Blume vs. trigger warnings: 'in any book there could be something to bother somebody'
Robby Soave at Hit & Run on Judy Blume:
Famed children’s book author Judy Blume is no fan of trigger warnings. In an interview during the Bay Area Book Festival earlier in June, Blume lamented that many on the left are now pushing censorship with the same zeal as the 1980s religious right.
“From the 1980s, from the extreme religious right where it all started, we’ve come to a lot of book-challenging from the left, also,” she said.
She singled out trigger warnings for special criticism.
“All books, then, need trigger warnings, because in any book there could be something to bother somebody,” she said.

Nicholls on gag laws
Writing in the Toronto Sun Gerry Nicholls says that freedom of speech (and freedom of association, through various advocacy organizations) is a basic freedom, and that attempts to limit political speech is anathema to democracy:
The more voices heard, the more debate that’s raised, the more points of view expressed, the better, right?
Democracy should be a free market place of competing ideas. Yet some in the media and in academia are currently calling for new laws that would stifle free democratic speech.
Mind you, they don’t put it in such blunt terms. Rather they argue that “Third parties,” i.e. any group that’s not a political party, -- taxpayer advocacy organizations, church groups, environmental associations --should be strictly regulated and controlled and as much as possible silenced.
More specifically their aim is to prevent independent organizations or groups of private citizens from having the freedom to spend money on political ads.
Nicholls points out that gag laws give political parties "an effective monopoly on debate," along with the media (that would be a duopoly, but it's just as unholy).
He also says that election campaign limits are easily extended from campaign to permanent feature of our politics year-round once the principle that political speech should be regulated is conceded.
It is hypocritical for a Conservative Party that ostensibly cares about liberty to entertain expanding draconian gag laws outside the Writ period, when they should, in fact, be scrapping the existing limits. There is also a hint of contradiction on the Left among those who support gag laws (either during or outside the formal campaign period) yet are concerned that the Canada Revenue Agency is cracking down on charities for political activity.
George Will's seven-word law of campaign finance should apply to political parties and non-governmental organizations: no cash, no foreign money, full disclosure. This would allow all citizens to participate in a transparent way, and provide a counterweight to the ability of the political parties and media to decide which issues are within the realm of permissible debate.

On Apple banning the Confederate flag
David Foster at Chicago Boyz:
Apple Computer, also, is following a similar course. They have banned the use of the Confederate flag even as a marker for units in Civil War simulation games sold on the App Store. (Specifically, they have banned any such marker appearing on a screenshot of the game which will appear in the store.)
Several days ago, I linked an article arguing that modern “liberalism,” or “progressivism,” or whatever they call themselves, is now almost purely a symbolic project. The Apple policy that I described about represents symbol-obsession taken to a level that is truly insane ...
While banning the use of the Confederate flag even for purposes of unit-identification icons, Apple has apparently not restricted the use of the Nazi swastika for similar purposes in WWII simulation games. I don’t conclude from this that Apple is a group of Nazi sympathizers, rather, that they are a group of herd-followers and enforcers of the “progressive” herd’s current direction, whatever that direction may be. (Apple once used the slogan “Think Different”…now, it seems, their slogan should be “think like you are supposed to!)

Cameron: no tolerance for Islamic terrorism
British Prime Minister David Cameron has a column in the Sunday Telegraph following the murder of vacationers on a Tunisia beach at the hands of Muslim terrorists last week:
When the gunman attacked innocent people spending time with their families on the beach, he was attacking the very things we stand for.
We must be stronger at standing up for our values – of peace, democracy, tolerance, freedom. We must be more intolerant of intolerance – rejecting anyone whose views condone the Islamist extremist narrative and create the conditions for it to flourish.
We must strengthen our institutions that put our values into practice: our democracy, our rule of law, the rights of minorities, our free media, our law enforcements – all the things the terrorists hate.

2016 watch (Bernie Sanders edition)
The Washington Times says that the anti-Hillary Clinton vote in the Democratic primaries is coalescing around socialist Senator Bernie Sanders and it reports on a number of polls showing that Clinton's lead over Sanders is decreasing in the first caucus (Iowa) and first primary (New Hampshire):
In Iowa, Mr. Sanders climbed to 26 percent in a Bloomberg Politics Poll released last week, up from previous polls showing his support in the mid-teens. He had nearly cut in half Mrs. Clinton’s lead.
The former first lady, senator and secretary of state captured 50 percent in the new poll, topping Mr. Sanders by 26 points. Her advantage over Mr. Sanders had shrunk from 41 points, when she had 57 percent support a month ago in a similar Bloomberg/Des Moines Register poll.
In New Hampshire, two polls showed Mr. Sanders on the rise.
He trailed Mrs. Clinton by just 8 points, 43 percent to 35 percent, in a WMUR/CNN Granite State Poll — his most stunning finish to date.
He climbed to 24 percent in a Bloomberg Politics poll of likely voters in New Hampshire’s first-in-the-nation Democratic primary. Mrs. Clinton won 56 percent for a 32-point lead in that poll, compared to a 44-point lead she held over Mr. Sanders in a similar poll in early May.
The other Democratic candidates have almost no support whatsoever: "The other Democratic contenders — former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley, former Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln Chafee and former Virginia Sen. Jim Webb, were relegated to just 1 percent, 2 percent or less in the new Iowa and New Hampshire polls."